The two reviews are very different the first just talks about the good and the second just looks at the bad in the game. The first review spend the first half talking about interviews with Ellen Page (The actress for the main character) and David Cage (The director of the game). In this review there was a very heavy look at the production of the game rather then the game its self. The second review talk about nearly all of the games aspect.
The first review spend the first paragraph just joking and does not really say much about it I didn't get any feel for the review as I could tell if it was making fun of the game are just trying to be funny. As for the other review I can tell what he thinks of the game from the first 20 seconds.
I think that the first review does not spend any time on the game. It talks about the Ellen Page not here character the actress here self and here feeling, thought and experiences. On the other hand the second review talks a lot about the character here journey in the game, personality, relationships and much more. The reviews are the opposites of each others. One hates it and the other doesn't love it but thinks its good but never says why. The other says that why its bad and gives every reason under the sun.
